The Evolution of Statistics

I wrote before how Bad Statistics Are Dangerous For Charities.

Here’s a great example of how a statistic evolves on-line…

Here’s the original statistic from the (questionable) research: “64% say that corporate social responsibility is core to their business rather than being a stand-alone programme”. Note that this is derived from asking CEOs “Which of these statements best describes your organisation today?” 

stat1

 

This is pulled in to a blog post and correctly used (although there’s no mention of the wishy-washy way the stat is derived):

stat2

But (presumably) the editor goes with a catchy headline, “64% of CEOs Are Increasing Investment in Corporate Social Responsibility in 2016 – Here’s Why”:

stat3

Although this same headline is used in the original blog – so there probably was no editor.

A Director of PWC UK then share’s the statistic, with a subtle but crucial change, “64% of CEOs increased investment into CSR in 2016”:

stat4

And forever now we’ll be reading that in 2016 the majority of CEOs increased investment in CSR.

The end.

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.